Numerator and the denominator and figure that out. Growing faster, in which case this might converge to 0? Or maybe they're growingĪt the same level, and maybe it'll converge Is going to go to infinity and this thing's And we care about the degreeīecause we want to see, look, is the numerator growingįaster than the denominator? In which case this thing What's happening as n gets larger and larger is lookĪt the degree of the numerator and the degree of N plus 1, the denominator n times n minus 10. To pause this video and try this on your ownīefore I'm about to explain it. Larger and larger, that the value of our sequence You to think about is whether these sequencesĬonverge just means, as n gets larger and In other words, a conditionally convergent series has the property that you get different answers if you rearrange or regroup the terms.įour different sequences here. Thus, conditionally convergent series are quite difficult to work with and it is very easy to get nonsense answers that look like they are correct. Thus, it is possible (by using the associative property and/or the commutative property) to group the terms of a conditionally convergent series to make it look like the series converges to any arbitrarily chosen number or to make it look like the the series diverges. The commutative and associative properties do not hold for conditionally convergent series. The sum of its negative terms diverges to negative infinity. The sum of its positive terms diverges to positive infinity.ĥ. It has both positive and negative terms.Ĥ. The series is convergent, that is it approaches a finite sum.ģ. Their "proof" was utter nonsense.Ī series is defined to be conditionally convergent if and only if it meets ALL of these requirements:Ģ. Thus when S fails to exist, it is possible to get various nonsensical and contradictory solutions.īasic mathematical operations all require that S exists, if S does not exist the operations can still produce "answers" but they will be nonsense.īTW, the Numberphile video where they "proved" that S of the positive integers was -1/12 made use of such nonsense with divergent series. Since it is possible to have multiple contradictory sums for S, it must be the case that S fails to exist. And, for that matter, it does not hold that S + S = 2S. It is not the case that the associative property holds for this particular series. It Is NOT the case that S=½ nor any of the other values we could come up with. This is obviously absurd and self-contradictory. So let us say that I added S to itself 999 times, giving me 1000S = S. It is still 1-1+1-1+1-1.Īnd, of course, I can add as many sets of S to each other as a like and they will still be the same sum, they will still be 1-1+1-1+1-1. Notice that if I add another copy of the sum 1-1+1-1+1-1. They have no more meaning than the "proofs" 1=2 which contain a hidden division by zero. In short, S fails to exist for a divergent series, thus computations with S are meaningless. In this case, the sequence is called divergent.You cannot assume the associative property applies to an infinite series, because it may or may not hold. (ii) l ≤ x, where x is any member of the set S.ġ. Similarly, l is the least member of a set S of real numbers, if (ii) L ≥ x, where x is any element of the set S. (i) L is itself a member of S i.e., L\in S and The idea of the limit of a sequence, bounds of a sequence, limit of the sequence of partial sums of an infinite series plays an important part in Mathematical Analysis.Ī number L is the greatest member of a set S of real numbers, if The concept of limit forms the basis of Calculus and distinguishes it from Algebra. Neighborhood of a Point: Points of Accumulation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |